Slot 5 of MAH MBA CET 2026 marked a slight shift from the earlier slots, with the paper being rated moderate overall. While some sections remained straightforward, others, particularly Logical Reasoning, demanded more time and careful reading.
Unlike Slot 1, 2, and 4, this slot introduced a slightly higher level of variation in question types, making it important for students to adapt quickly within the exam.
Overall, the paper continued to be speed-driven, but with a noticeable increase in time pressure in LR and QA.
Overall Snapshot
| Section | No. of Questions | Difficulty Level |
| Logical Reasoning | 75 | Moderate |
| Abstract Reasoning | 25 | Easy |
| Quantitative Aptitude | 50 | Easy to Moderate |
| VARC | 50 | Moderate |
| Total | 200 | Moderate |
Key Highlights
- Logical Reasoning was lengthy and slightly tougher than earlier slots
- Presence of 2 puzzle-based questions (rare compared to other slots)
- Quant was arithmetic-heavy but calculation-intensive
- VARC was moderate, with vocabulary slightly tougher than usual
- Abstract Reasoning remained easy and scoring
- Paper required better time management compared to previous slots
Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC)
The VARC section was moderate, with a slight increase in difficulty compared to earlier slots.
There were 4 RC passages with 5 questions each (20 questions total). Topics included:
- Short story-based passages
- Mergers and Acquisitions
- Penguin-related passage
- One additional general passage
Two RCs were reported to be easy, while one required more careful reading, especially for tone-based questions.
The Verbal Ability section included a mix of grammar, vocabulary, and sentence-based questions.
Breakdown
| Topic | No. of Questions |
| Reading Comprehension (4 passages) | 20 |
| Vocabulary | 5–6 |
| Fill in the Blanks | 5 |
| Statements & Assumptions | 5 |
| Error Detection | 4 |
| Sentence Correction | 3 |
| Para Completion | 3 |
| Para Jumbles | 1 |
| Active-Passive | 1 |
| Direct-Indirect Speech | 1 |
| Correct Usage | 2 |
| Total | 50 |
Vocabulary questions were slightly tricky, with close options, making elimination harder.
Quantitative Aptitude
The Quant section was easy to moderate, but relatively lengthy due to calculations.
Arithmetic dominated the section, with very limited presence of higher math topics.
Breakdown
| Topic | No. of Questions |
| Data Interpretation (Pie + Table) | 10 |
| Time-Speed-Distance | 5 |
| Number Series | 4 |
| Percentages | 4 |
| Probability / PnC | 3 |
| Mensuration | 3 |
| Profit & Loss | 3 |
| Miscellaneous Arithmetic | 5 |
| HCF | 1 |
| Pipes & Cisterns | 1 |
| Time & Work | 1 |
| Simple & Compound Interest | 2 |
| Divisibility | 1 |
| Mixtures | 1 |
| BODMAS | 2 |
| Ages | 1 |
| Total | 50 |
DI sets were straightforward, but overall the section became time-consuming due to multiple calculation steps.
Logical Reasoning
Logical Reasoning was the most challenging section in this slot, primarily due to its length and variety.
Unlike earlier slots, this section included:
- 2 puzzle-based questions
- Presence of Critical Reasoning (Assertion-based)
- A mix of both traditional and CET-style singlets
Breakdown
| Topic | No. of Questions |
| Number Series | 6 |
| Divisibility | 2 |
| Input-Output | 5 |
| Data Sufficiency | 5 |
| Venn Diagrams | 5 |
| Meaningful Arrangement | 5 |
| Linear Arrangement | 6 |
| PnC / Probability | 3 |
| Directions | 5 |
| Analogy | 4 |
| Blood Relations | 5 |
| BODMAS / Calculation Logic | 4 |
| Puzzle-based Questions | 2 |
| Calendar | 1 |
| DI-based LR | 5 |
| Miscellaneous | 12–15 |
| Total | 75 |
Key Observations
- Majority of questions were still singlets
- Presence of Critical Reasoning (5–6 questions) was a deviation
- Puzzle questions were limited but time-consuming
- Input-output questions required careful tracking
Students reported that LR required maximum time investment in this slot.
Abstract Reasoning
Abstract Reasoning remained easy and scoring, consistent with earlier slots.
Distribution
- Analogy-based questions dominated (around 13 questions)
- Missing figures, odd one out, and series-based questions were present
- Pattern-based continuation questions were straightforward
Most students were able to attempt 23–25 questions comfortably.
Student Sentiment
Student reactions for Slot 5 indicated a noticeable shift in difficulty.
- “LR was lengthy and slightly tougher than other slots”
- “Quant was easy but calculation-heavy”
- “VARC vocab was slightly tricky”
- “Abstract was very easy”
Attempts were slightly lower than earlier slots, but still strong overall.
Overall Takeaway
Slot 5 of MAH MBA CET 2026 was relatively more balanced, with a slight increase in difficulty compared to earlier slots.
- Abstract Reasoning continued to be the most scoring section
- VARC required better attention due to vocabulary and RC variation
- Quant was straightforward but time-consuming
- Logical Reasoning emerged as the key differentiator
Given the moderate and slightly lower attempts compared to earlier slots, the cutoff for this slot may be marginally lower, but still competitive.
As with all CET slots, percentile calculation remains slot-wise, and performance should be evaluated relative to candidates within the same slot.
